Home > News > Industry news > Equinor’s ambition in floating offshore wind
News
company news
Exhibition news
Industry news
Certifications
Contact Us
Cowinns Industry Equipment Co.,Ltd
No.127 Room No.748 Changjiang Road,High-Tech District,
Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, zip:215128 China
Tel:+86 512 6878 1993 
Fax:+86 512 6818 4193
Mob&what's app:+86 153 0620 9257 
Email:info@cowinns.com
www.cowinns.com
Contact Now
News

The difference between DBB, DIB-1, DIB-2

Two types of seat sealing structures commonto trunnion mounted ball valves. 1. Double block and bleed valve A valve with two valve seat sealing pairsc...

Introduction to PID Diagram Knowledge of Valve Industry

Introductionto PID Diagram Knowledgeof Valve Industry PID diagram is thetechnical core of factory production. Whether it is an engineer from a designi...

Gaskets Are Not Created Equal

Gaskets are near the bottom of the food chain of valve components; trim, body materials and packing seem to get a lot more press. But gaskets serve an...

True Meaning of Double Block and Bleed

It’s time to do maintenance ona section of process. You don't want to shut down the entire facility, so youdecide to block off and depressurize just ...

Why PTFE-Lined valves should be cossetted

“Every day is a learning opportunity”, is a saying which is often heard here in the Valve World editorial department. After all, the valve industry is so diverse, and the number of applications so huge, that no-one (and certainly not a humble editor!) can possibly hope to know everything.

LNG: Significant opportunities for cryogenic valves

Quenching the world’s thirst for energy while mitigating climate change and air pollution is one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century. Natu...

VELAN VTP-2000 Ball Valve

A high performance ball valve with an affordable price Velan Inc., a leading manufacturer of high quality industrial valves for a broad range of indus...

Valve maintenance on its way to the cloud

Edited by Constanze Schmitz, Analyst ARC Advisory Group Europe ___ In the process industries, one of the most important, yet often over-looked assets,...

China (Shanghai) International Fluid Machinery Exhibition (2)

China (Shanghai)International Fluid Machinery Exhibition (2) The China(Shanghai) International Fluid Machinery Exhibition is one of the mostsignifican...

18''RF WCB Butterfly valve

Customized top connection dimensions 18'' RF WCB butterfly valve  supplied to power plant service for high temperature steam pipeline 

News

Equinor’s ambition in floating offshore wind

Lucien Joppen valve-world.net 2019-03-08 17:47:21
Equinor is planning to merge offshore wind and fossil energy exploitation with the Hywind Tampen project. The Norwegian company wants to further develop its floating wind technology to become a market leader in this field by 2030.

Wind farm

Article by Lucien Joppen
____
Earlier this year, Equinor (formerly known as Statoil) announced it is considering the project which will be given a final go-ahead or not. The decision will depend mostly on the financing. The project at the Gullfaks and Snorre oilfields, located on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, would cost around 5 billion Norwegian crowns ($592 million). The industry’s NOx-fund has already pledged to invest 566 million NOK, roughly 10% of the total investment. In return, the project (expected to generate 88 MW) could reduce the country’s emissions of carbon dioxide by more than 200,000 tons per year, according to Equinor.
This emission reduction is attributed to the use of renewable energy instead of natural gas-fueled turbines that supply energy to platforms in both oilfields. According to Equinor, these fields provide the ideal location for such a project. It is also a worldwide first for an offshore project in which renewable and fossil energy are combined.

CO2 reduction needed
As mentioned before, the Norwegian government would benefit from lower carbon energy usage. Especially as its greenhouse gas emissions have remained high despite pledges for deep cuts under international accords such as the Paris climate deal. Last year, Norway’s annual emissions were 2.4% above 1990 levels at 52.4 million tons.
“To maintain profitable operations in Norwegian offshore in the long term, it is essential that we do our utmost to further reduce the carbon footprint from our activities,” Equinor’s Executive Vice President Arne Sigve Nylund said.
The other reason for implementing offshore wind is cost reduction by making these renewable energy sources more costcompetitive.
For the time being, floating offshore wind is still in its infancy, although there have been previous attempts to make it work. Based on Equinor’s first floating offshore wind project, off the coast of Peterhead (Scotland), the company estimates it could generate electricity at a cost of approximately 100 euro per MW/h in Hywind Tampen.


Scaling-up key
This would mean a considerable cost reduction (between 40% and 50%) compared to Equinor’s Scottish pilot wind farm. This cost reduction can mainly be attributed to the larger scale: with 88 MW the Hywind Tampen (generating 35% of the total energy consumption at the Snorre and Gullfaks-platforms) is more than double the size of the pilot (30 MW). As mentioned before, scaling-up is key in bringing costs down (CAPEX and OPEX).
As for this particular project, the financial forecast has not been finalized yet. A final investment decision on the project will be made in 2019. Equinor says it hopes that the Norwegian government subsidies would cover half the capital expenditure for the project. Given the country’s track record on reducing CO2 emissions, this investment could pay off, especially if it could stimulate lower carbon technology development and deployment and, at the same time, make a vital sector of the Norwegian economy more cost-competitive.


The Gullfaks field is owned by Equinor, OMV and Norway’s
state-owned Petoro, while Snorre is owned by Equinor, Petoro,
ExxonMobil, Idemitsu, DEA and Point Resources.

Word leader in offshore wind
Equinor has high hopes for its Hywind concept. On its corporate website, the company has expressed two ambitions: to bring floating offshore wind to industry scale in 2030 and to further develop Hywind as the most cost-competitive concept.
Equinor believes floating offshore wind can reach 12 GW by 2030, which means that besides Hywind, other floating concepts will get to market. For Equinor it is clear that the project won’t succeed without the combined efforts of technology owners, project developers, suppliers and regulators working together to achieve the necessary scale, innovation and cost reduction.
“We also believe in the need to standardise”, Equinor states on its website. “We will apply learnings from bottom-fixed offshore wind farms, as well as from the oil and gas industry, to further industrialize the Hywind concept.”
In May of this year, Statoil announced the establishment of New Energy Solutions as a separate business area, reflecting the company’s aspirations to gradually complement its oil and gas portfolio with profitable renewable energy and low-carbon solutions.

Floating wind technology
The concept of offshore floating wind turbines was developed in the early 1970s in the United States. It would take roughly 37 years before the first working concept (a prototype) was launched in 2007 by the Dutch company H. Technologies. This prototype was installed off the coast of Apula, Italy, at a depth of 113 metres. The project was decommissioned in 2008.
Offshore floating wind is argued to be less expensive than fixed platforms, more suitable for greater depths and favorable wind conditions, thereby increasing the potential for offshore wind in general.
As for the anchoring of these floaters, two principal systems have been developed: the catenary loose mooring system and the tension-leg system.
With the first system, a single floating cylindrical spar is buoy moored using catenary cables. The Hywind technology is based on this system, with the addition of a ballasted catenary layout that adds 60 tons hanging from the midpoint of each anchor cable to provide additional tension.
The other system is based upon a tower-bearing structure which is either free floating or pulled by tensioned cables towards seabed anchors.